Isolated
dislocation of the hip
K.
PAPAGEORGIOU, I. GAITATGIS, A. HATZIOANNIDIS, K. VRADELIS
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, General Hospital of Drama
ABSTRACT
Our study concerns patients with hip dislocation, who were treated
conservatively. During the period 1980-2001 we have treated 20 patients
with traumatic hip dislocation, aged 17 to 60 (mean age of 33 years),
in whom men, with right sided posterior dislocation predominate and
main cause was traffic road accident. 11 out of 20 patients had associated
injuries and the majority of dislocations were reduced within the
first 24 hours. Simple dislocations -according to Stewart-Milford
classification- were predominated and 2 patients had paresis of sciatic
nerve. After reduction of hip dislocation skeletal traction and thereafter
physiotherapy was applied, as well as avoidance of loading, according
of the type and concomitant injuries. Al the patients were reexamined
1 to 20 years (mean 8,85), after injury. By using pain, range of motion
and return to work as criteria, results were satisfactory in the majority
of the patients. A radiologic control (classical x-ray diagnostic
picture) revealed heterotopic ossification in 3 out of 20 patients
and osteoarthitic changes in 6, sans any clinical symptoms. Our observations
and a review of literature show that simple hip dislocations had better
functional recovery. Good results are obtained by early, accurate
and stable reduction of dislocation. Associated injuries and late
complications as avascular necrosis of the femoral head and osteoarthritis
are severe with unfavourable prognosis.
Κey words: Hip, Dislocation, Conservative treatment.
INTRODUCTION
The hip is defined as stable joint, thus strong violence is demanded
for the dislocation to occur. Associated injuries exist in 35 to 95%
and include cranio-cerbral, chest, abdomen and musculo-skeletal injuries.
Besides there may also be fractures in femoral head and the acetabular
and in the adjacent area, without excluding the possibility that a
fracture may exist in the long bone of the co ordinate and corresponding
leg[8,24,25].
The Fracture-Dislocation of the hip was described by sir Aslley Cooper
in 1791[18].The dislocation is more likely to occur to young motorcyclist
and casualties from accidents with private cars (Dashboard injury).
The direction of the dislocation depends on the position of the hip,
the direction of the forces and also anatomy. The anterior dislocation
are caused by forces with the leg in abduction and an lateral rotation
and they cover 10-18%, of the total, while the posterior are caused
by forces applied with the leg in (Flexion of the Knee-Hip) adduction
and internal rotation. A fracture of the femoral head occurs 22-77%
of the anterior dislocation and 10% of the posterior[5,10,25]. There
are not many studies covering a long period of follow -up after a
isolated dislocation of the hip and generally their prognosis is good[6,11,13,18].
Prognosis for these injuries depends on the time intervening between
the injury and the dislocation, the accompanying injuries and the
treatment after the dislocation[13,25].
Our aim is to present a retrospective study of conservative treatment
of isolated (Simple) dislocation of the hip, with a long period of
follow -up in relation to prognostic factors.
1.
Picture 1.
Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. Posterior dislocation right
hip in man of 21 years, after road accident. The patient did not have
accompanying injury, neuro-vascular injury and dislocation occurs
at the collision in the dashboard of the car.
2.
3.
Pictures 2,
3. Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis, in neutral position
and abduction, after reduction that became under general anaesthesia,
6 hours from injury. The hip they are clinical and radiological stable.
It was applied skeletal traction for 4/52 and won weight-Bearing for
one month.
MATERIAL-METHOD
20 patients with this injury were treated during the years 1980-2001,
all aged 17-60 years (average 33yrs), predominating males (14/20)
and right -side location of the injury (table 1). The main cause of
the injury was the toad accident (18/20) and accompanying injuries
were found in 11 patients, mostly fractures in the co-ordinate side
(5 fractures in short bones and 1 with a fracture in long bone) (table
2). Posterior dislocation predominated (16/20) and patients with simple
dislocation were selected: Type I: 16, and Type II: 4 with a fracture
posterior wall of the acetabulum san displacement, according to Stewart-Milford[23],
Thompson-Epstein[26] classifications (table 3)[25] and with a confirmed
clinical and radiological stability. In all the cases reduction was
made under general intube anaesthesia through Allis method and was
successful at first attempt in 17 cases, at second in 2 and rather
laborious in one case. In all the cases the clinical stability was
checked (Rotation) with the hip in flexion. Apart from the usual radiological
examination in 9/10, there was also an computed tomography, to confirm
concentric reduction[4,25]. As regard to time the dislocation was
reduction within the first six hours in 16 cases, within 6 to 12 hours
in 3 cases and in 1 case it was reduction otherwise. Sceletal traction
was applied to all the patients from tibial tubercle for 3/52 with
both active and passive motion of the suffering hip.
Mobilization followed with non weight Bearing for a month and partial
weight-Bearing for 3/52. Complete loading was permissible 10-12/52
after the injury. Early complications appeared in 2 patients with
a posterior dislocations, a male with paralysis of the ischiatic nerve
who recovered after 14/52 and a female with an extensive rupture -haematoma
in glouteal area that was treated successfully.
4.

5. 
Pictures 4,
5. Anteroposterior
radiograph of the pelvis, in neutral position and abduction, 19 years
after injury. The patient in asymptomatic and radiological does not
exist osteoarthric changes. In outside of the neck observed osseous
hyperplasia, propably from draw and separation of the articular capsule.
6.
Picture 6.
Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. Anterior dislocation right
hip of Type I, in man of 35 years, after road accident, without neuro-vascular
damage. The patient had pneumonothorax with fractures of the ribs
and fracture of the mandible.
7.
Picture 7.
Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis, that became under general
anaesthesia, 6 hours from injury. The right hip they are clinical
and radiological stability. It was applied skeletal traction for 4/52,
non weigh-Bearing for one month.
8. 
9.
Pictures 8, 9. Anteroposterior
radiograph of pelvis, in neutral position and in abduction, 3 years
after injury. The patient is asymptomatic and radiological is not
observed osteoathritic changes.
RESULTS
All patients had both a clinical and radiological re-examination
2-20 years (average 8,85), while 8/20 patients had a period follow-up
longer than 10 years. For clinical evaluation we used the Epstein
clinical criteria7, that classify results as follow:
- Excellent: There is no pain, full range of hip motion. No roentgenographic
evidence of progressive changes.
- Good: No pain, free motion 75% of normal hip motion. No more than
a slight limp, minimum roentgenographic changes.
- Fair: Any one or more of the following: pain, but no disabling,
limited motion of the hip, no adduction deformity. Moderate limp,
moderately severe roentgenographic changes.
- Poor: Any one or more of the following: disabling pain, marked limitation
of motion or adduction deformity. Redislocation, progressive roentgenographic
changes.
Based on these criteria the result was excellent in 12 good in 7 and
fair in 1 (table 2) (pictures 1-9). Furthermore, based on subjective
criteria (How the patients themselves felt, their efficiency), the
result was on the whole satisfactory and most of them returned to
their previous occupations.
The pain was mild in 7 cases without need for medicine and in 1 case
mild occasional need for analgesic. Stiffness was found I 7 patients
without any serious functional implications (over 75% movement). Incipient
changes of post traumatic arthritis were found in x-Ray examinations
of 5 patients and medium gravity ones were found in 1 patient.
There seems to be lack of correspondence between clinical and radiological
finds (Patients with osteoarthritis changes do not have symptoms).
The small number of patients does not allow us to conclude whether
and to what point this is statistically important. As for late complications,
3 patients had ectopic ossification Type I according to Brooker[2],
without any essential functional implications on the hip. Avascular
necrosis of the femoral head was not observed to any of the patients.

DISCUSSION
Traumatic dislocation of the hip used to be rare formerly and
was mainly caused by fall from a horse. As time has passed its epidemiological
and statistical data have changed. In recent decades there has been
an increase in the frequency of occurrence due to road accidents (High
energy road accident). The most frequent mechanism causing it, is
hit of the bent Knee on the dashboard (Dashboard injury), especially
when safety belt are not fastened. In a percentage from 62-93% in
recent series the cause is high energy road accident[13,25,28]. In
our series a road accident was the cause for 18/20 cases (14 in a
car and 4 on a motorcycle).
Associated injuries to this grave injury are the rule and range from
40-75%[21]. It appears that associated injuries have an unfavorable
influence on the final result, especially these of the lower limbs6.
In our series, despite the small number of patients, from 9 patients
without accompanying injuries 7 had an excellent result, while from
11 patients with associated injuries (in 5 of them there were fractures
of the lower limbs and 3 an accompanying fracture posterior lip of
the acetabulum) only 5 had an excellent result (tables 1,2).
We have to remind here that the main principles in treating dislocation
of the hip are the following:
1. Careful, detailed examination of the patient for associated injuries
(Multi-Trauma patients, unconscious patients, fractures of the ipsilateral
leg).
2. Radiological study with simple x-ray and computer tomography for
the control of concentric reduction and MRI if needed.
3. Immediate close reduction with checking of the clinical and radiological
stability.
4. A final estimation of the congruity of articular surfaces and examination
for associated fracture femoral head-acetabulum[7,10,11,13,15,20,25].
Besides avoidance of violent movement is mentioned and not more than
two attempts of reduction there was a risk of causing subcapital fracture
and posttraumatic arthritis[3].
Most authors agree that early (immediate) reduction is the most important
element of the initial management that prevents late complications
caused by insufficient blood flow of the femoral head. The first 12
hours are regarded as a critical time period, while from recent studies
it is shown that there is no important statistic difference between
12 and 24 hours[28].
Although in our study with small number of patients no diachronic
aggravation of the osteoarthritis was found during a long follow -up
(Young patients without particularly serious associated injuries).
In other studies it appears that secondary osteoarthritis increase
with time and this is related to age and associated injuries[27].
The relatively easy reduction may indicate a wide rupture - detachment
of the posterior articular capsule in posterior dislocations and this
could lead to redislocation if immobilization is not safe and sufficient
in time[17].
For a long period of studies and research prolonged immobilization
and discharge was the usual practice, but recent studies have not
proved destructive consequences from early mobilization with continuous
passive motion and an early weight -Bearing depending on the type
of dislocation, associated injuries, age and the quality of the bone[10,14,22].
Simple traumatic dislocation without fracture quickly reset has a
good result 85 to 100%[13,16]. Yet there are studies in which, isolated
dislocations oh the hip gave a bad result at percentage up to 30%,
for posterior dislocations[6].
Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is one of the most serious
complications and occurs from 1,7 up to 40%, percentage which increases
when reduction is delayed. If reduction is made within the first 6
hours, avascular necrosis ranges from 2-10% (table 4)[25]. Postraumatic
arthritis is the next mayor complication that occurs to a percentage
20% and may reach 70%,after an open reduction[23]. It is believed
today that apart from other factors, arthritis result from injury
of articular cartilage (Destruction of the chodrocytes) at the time
of the dislocation[1,19,25].
CONCLUSIONS
Simple (Isolated) dislocations of the hip with clinical and radiological
stability, without associated injuries to demand restoration have
a good prognosis and usually satisfactory results.
Reduction the soonest possible and absence of associated injuries
are regarded as factors of good prognosis.
Besides as results from recent studies, injury of the reticular cartilage
at the time of the dislocation, might silently menace of provocation
posttraumatic arthritis, so the doctor must keep this in mind and
inform the patient property.
REFERENCES
1. Borelli J.Jr, Torrilli P.A, Griglene R., et al. Effect of
impact load on articular cartilage: A model for die punch intraarticular
fractures. Presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Orthopedic
Trauma Association.Tampa, Fla September 29 Odobort 1995.
2. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., Riley L.H. Ectopic
ossification Following total hip replacement incidence and a method
of classification. J Bone and Joint Surg{Am}. 1973; 55-A, 1629-32.
3. Canale S.T.B., Manugian H.A. Irreducible Traumatic Dislocations
of the Hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1979; 61A, 1, 7-14.
4. Calkins S.M., Zych D.O., Latta L., Botza J.F., Mnaymneh W. Computer
Tomography Evaluation of stability in Posterior Fracture Dislocation
of the hip. Clin Othop and Rel Res. 1988; 227, 152-63.
5. DeLee J.C., Evans J.A., Thomas J. Anterior dislocation of the hip
and associated femoral -head fractures. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1980;
62-A, 969-4.
6. Dreinhofer E.K., Schwarkopf S.R., Haas P.N., Tscherne H. Isolated
Traumatic Dislocation of the Hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1994; 76-B,
6-12.
7. Epstein C.H. Posterior Dislocations of the hip. J Bone and Joint
Surg. 1974; 56-A, 1103-26.
8. Gillespie W.J. The incidence and patern of the Knee injury associated
with dislocation of the hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1975; 57-B, 376-8.
9. Hougaard K., Lindequist K., Nielsen B.L. Computerised Tomography
after posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1987;
69-B, 4, 556-7.
10. Hougaard K., Thomsen B.P. Coxarthrosis following Traumatic Posterior
Dislocation of the hip. 1987; 69-A, 5, 679-83.
11. Hougaard K., Thomsen B.P. Traumatic Posterior Fracture Dislocation
of the hip, with Fracture of the femoral head or neck or both. J Bone
and Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A, 1, 233-9.
12. Harris H.W. Traumatic Arthritis of the hip after Dislocation and
acetabular fractures: Treatment by Mold Arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint
Surg. 1969; 51-A, 4, 737-55.
13. Jacob R.L., Rao P.G., Ciccarelli C. Traumatic Dislocation and
Fracture Dislocation o the hip. Clin Orthop and Rel Res. 1987; 214,
249-63.
14. Jasculka R.A., Fischer G., Fenze G. Dislocation and Fracture dislocation
of the hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1991; 73-B, 465-9.
15. Keith E.J., Brashear R., Guilford B. Stability of posterior fracture
dislocations of the hip. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1988; 70-A, 6, 711-4.
16. Niederwieser B., Primavesi C. Die traumatische hugtglenksverrenkung
in: 54 Jahhrestagung det Deutschen Gesellschalt fur Unllheikunde helte
zur Unfallheikunde. 1991; 220, 59-60.
17. -ανταζόπουλος Θ., Γαλανός -., Καπέτσης -. Υποτροπιάζον τραυματικό
εξάρθρημα του ισχίου. Ιατρική. 1991; 19, 3, 296-9.
18. Reigstad A. Traumatic dislocation of the hip. J Trauma. 1980;
20, 603-6.
19. Repo R.U., Finlay J.B. Survival of the articular cartilage after
controlled impact. J Bone and Joint Surg. {Am} 1977; 77-A, 1068-76.
20. Rockwood A.C., Green P.D. Fractures. Sec ed Lippincott Co 1984;
2.
21. Rosental R.E., Ciker W.L. Posterior Fracture -Dislocation of the
hip: An Epidemiology review. J Trauma. 1979; 19, 572-81.
22. Schilichewel W., Elsasser B., Mullaji A.B., et al. Hip dislocation
without fracture: Traction or mobilization after reduction. Injury.
1993; 24, 27-31.
23. Stewart M.J., Milford L.W. Fracture -dislocation of the hip: an
end- result study. J Bone and Joint Surg. {Am} 1954; 2, 36, 315-42.
24. Suraci A.J. Distribution and severity of injuries associated with
hip dislocation secondary to motor vehicle accidents. J Trauma. 1986;
26, 458-60.
25. Tornetta P., Mostafavi R.H. Hip Dislocation Current Treatment
Regiments. Journal of the Amer Acad of Othop Surg. 1997; 5, 1.
26. Thompson V.P., Epstein H.C. Traumatic dislocation of the hip:
A survey of two hundred and four cases covering a period of twenty
-one years. J Bone and Joint Surg.{Am} 1951; 7, 33, 746-78.
27. Upadhyay S.S., Moulton A., Srikrishnamurthy K. An analysis of
the late effects of traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip without
fractures. J Bone and Joint Surg. {Br} 1983; 65, 150-2.
28. Yang R.S., Tsuany Y.H., Hang Y.S., Liu T.K. Traumatic dislocation
of the hip. Clin Orthop and Rel Res. 1991; 265, 218-27.
Mailing
address:
Dr Kosmas Papageorgiou
Consultant AΥ Department of Orthopaedic
Averof 5, 66100 Drama
Tel: 2521031563, Fax: 2521023382
E-mail: kosmasp@otenet.gr