Surgical
treatment of chronic posterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder
by transfer of the subscapularis tendon
J.C.
FEROUSSIS[1], I.K. TRIANTAFILLOPOULOS[2], P. DALLAS[1], A. ZOGRAFIDIS[1],
N. KONSTANTINOU[1], A. PAPASPILIOPOULOS[1]
[1] 17th Orthopaedic Department, Asklepeion Voula Hospital
[2] 21st Orthopaedic Department, Medical School, University of Athens
ABSTRACT
We evaluated the results of treatment in six patients with chronic
locked posterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint associated
with an anteromedial humeral head defect involving 20% to 40% of the
articular surface. Patients sustained open reduction and transfer
of the subscapularis tendon to the defect, according to McLaughlin's
technique. The average length of follow up was three and a half years.
Four patients, with a dislocation less than three months, had excellent
results demonstrating little or no pain, almost full range of motion
and no functional restriction in the activities of daily living. The
remaining two patients, with dislocation more than three months, had
good results demonstrating slight restriction of motion and mild functional
disability. All patients had normal muscle strength and the Constant
score was above 80%. At three months, patients could perform all activities
except strenuous manual labour. At six months, patients returned to
unrestricted full activity. McLaughlin's technique reliably decreases
pain and significantly improves range of motion and level of function,
restoring the stability of the glenohumeral joint.
Key words: Chronic posterior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation,
subscapularis muscle transfer.
INTRODUCTION
Posterior shoulder dislocation is a relatively uncommon event, with
an incidence of 1% to 4% of all shoulder dislocations. Because of
the infrequency of this condition, the diagnosis is often missed,
with significant consequences to the patient[12]. Symptoms may be
confused with a shoulder contusion or rotator cuff injury. Significant
complications such as chronic posterior dislocation and degenerative
disease of the shoulder can occur if the diagnosis is missed[11].
The diagnosis and management of chronic, locked, posterior fracture-dislocations
of the glenohumeral joint remain a challenge for the treating physician.
Treatment consisted of closed reduction and immobilization, McLaughlin's
procedure by subscapularis muscle transfer, hemiarthroplasty, total
shoulder arthroplasty, open reduction with internal fixation, arthroplastic
resection, and arthrodesis[8]. In our study, we advocated open reduction
of the glenohumeral joint and the McLaughlin's procedure for the treatment
of chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocation with head defect
of less than 40% of the articular surface and we evaluated the results
and the final outcome of this procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
Six consecutive patients who had missed, locked, posterior fracture-dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint, were treated with open reduction and transfer
of the subscapularis tendon to the defect, according to McLaughlin's
technique[9,10]. There were four men and two women from twenty-five
to fifty-two years of age. Motor vehicle accident was the cause of
the injury in all cases.
Patients were complaining for shoulder pain and restriction of movements.
Complete elimination of external rotation was noticed in all cases.
Furthermore, prominence of the acromion and posterior shoulder bulging
were also detected.
The interval from injury to diagnosis was six weeks to six months.
Four patients had a locked dislocation for a period less than three
months and two patients for a period more than three months (figure
1). An axillary radiograph and a computed tomography scan, which demonstrated
the approximate size of the impression defect, confirmed diagnosis
(figure 2)[13]. In all cases, the defect of the humeral head involved
20% to 40% of the articular surface. In one case, an associated subcapital
fracture of the humerus was present. Unsuccessful closed reduction
was attempted in two cases.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Under general anaesthesia, patient was placed in the beach-chair position
with the head of the bed elevated approximately 30 degrees. The anterior
deltopectoral approach was used and developed from its origin, superiorly
at the clavicle, to its distal extend, at the insertion of the pectoralis
major. Rotator cuff interval was identified following the landmarks
of the upper end of the bicipital groove and the anterosuperior edge
of the glenoid. The subscapularis tendon was identified and carefully
dissected from the lesser tuberosity with a small piece of bone. An
effort was made to keep the inferior aspect of the subscapularis tendon,
for the protection of the axillary nerve that passes just below the
most inferior edge of the tendon. Tendon was dissected using an electro-cutting
instrument. The goal of the osteotomy of the small piece of bone was
not to fill the whole defect but to achieve a better fixation of the
sutures. Osteotomy was performed with a sharp osteotome without disturbing
the bicipital groove and the subscapularis was tagged with a No1 Mersilene
suture and retracted medially. Extensive soft tissue release both
to the anterior and to the posterior aspect of the shoulder was then
performed. During mobilization, axillary nerve damage risk both to
the anterior as well as to the posterior aspect of the shoulder was
taken into consideration. With slight external rotation and gentle
traction in 90 degrees of flexion, dislocation was reduced. A Bristow
elevator was inserted and used as a lever taking great care not to
damage the humeral head. At that point, the humeral head and the joint
were visualized and the remaining articular cartilage was carefully
inspected to assess the degree of degenerative changes. The defect
was then prepared to expose a bleeding bony surface that would facilitate
healing of both the subscapularis tendon and the bone fragment. Finally,
the subscapularis tendon was transferred into the defect as close
to the articular cartilage as possible in a way to achieve a buttress
effect. The tendon was fixed in place using trans-osseous sutures
or Mitek anchors. After completion of the transfer, stability of the
glenohumeral joint was accessed. Closure was begun by assessing the
rotator interval followed by the closure of the deltopectoral interval.
In two cases, dislocations were more than three months old, and extensive
soft tissue release led to relative instability. In those cases, a
Kirschner wire was used to stabilize the joint for ten days until
the soft tissues healed (figure 3). In one case, with a six-weeks-old
associated subcapital fracture, the fracture was mobilized and a fixation
plate was used (figure 4). All patients were immobilized postoperatively
for a period of three to six weeks with the arm at the side and in
neutral rotation.
1.
2.
Figure 1. Six-months-old posterior fracture-dislocation of the right
shoulder.
Figure 2. Computed tomography confirming an old posterior fracture-dislocation
of the right shoulder and determining the size of the humeral head
defect.
REHABILITATION
Prior to discharge, at the first or second postoperative day, additional
radiographs were obtained to confirm the position of the humeral head
at the glenoid (figures 5,6). The arm was immobilized in a neutral
rotation by a special cast. The duration of immobilization ranged
from four to six weeks. At that period, patient was allowed free movement
of the hand and wrist and was instructed to perform deltoid isometrics.
At the completion of the immobilization period, the cast was removed
and a sling was placed for additional two weeks. At this period, the
patient was allowed active motion of the elbow, wrist and hands. When
the sling was discontinued, patients were instructed to use the upper
extremity for activities of daily living. Internal rotation exercises
were restricted for three months. Gentle stretching exercises were
added at ten weeks and resistive strengthening exercises at twelve
weeks.
3.
Figure 3. Postoperative
x-ray showing the provisional stabilization of the unstable gleno-humeral
joint with a k-wire.
4.
5.
Figure 4. A six-weeks-old
associated subcapital fracture of the humerus, treated with plate
fixation.
Figure 5. Postoperative x-ray confirming the reduction of the gleno-humeral
joint. A special brace keeps the humerus in neutral rotation.
RESULTS
The average length of follow up was three and a half years. Stability
was restored and maintained in all cases. Four patients reported little
or no pain. They regained almost full range of motion and no functional
restriction in the activities of daily living (Figure 7). The results
considered being excellent. Constant score was above 90%[4]. The remaining
two patients, with unreduced dislocation more than three months, had
slight restriction of motion, mild functional disability and the results
considered good (figure 8). Constant score was above 80%. All patients
had good muscle strength. No patient developed avascular necrosis
of the head but one had signs of mild arthrosis of the joint.
At three months, patients could perform all activities except strenuous
manual labour. At six months, patients returned to unrestricted full
activity.
6.

Figure 6. Postoperative x-ray confirming the reduction of the gleno-humeral
joint. Mitek anchors have been used for the subscapularis tendon transfer.
7.

Figure 7. Range of motion in a woman with a less than 3-months-old
posterior dislocation of the right shoulder, six months after surgery.
8.

Figure 8. Range of motion in a man with a more than 3-months-old posterior
dislocation of the right shoulder, six months after surgery.
DISCUSSION
Posterior glenohumeral dislocations may result in anteromedial head
impression fractures referred as reverse Hill-Sachs defects. The bony
defect can become a factor causing recurrent instability. When this
occurs, operative management is often directed at correcting the anteromedial
humeral head defect.
Chronic, missed, locked, posterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder
raise a difficult problem for treatment, especially in young patients.
Surgical options depend on the etiology of the dislocation, the chronicity
of the dislocation, the age of the patient, and the determination
of the size of the humeral head defect. Therefore, preoperative planning
is very important.
A careful assessment of the etiology of the posterior dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint is of great importance. An underlying seizure
disorder is often present1. This will require a neurologist's consultation
in order to control seizures and avoid additional episodes during
the postoperative period, and to identify any treatable etiology of
the seizure disorder. Other causes of the posterior shoulder dislocation
involve motor-vehicle accidents, alcohol-related injuries or electroshock[6].
Chronicity should also be assessed preoperatively. Firstly, will indicate
the chance of achieving a successful closed reduction. Secondly, it
will provide some indication of the difficulty of achieving an open
reduction, and thirdly, it will indicate the status of the remaining
articular cartilage. Checchia and co-authors, annualised the surgical
outcome of fifty-six shoulders treated with several methods during
a mean follow-up of three years. They found good and excellent results
in those cases that were treated up to two years of the lesion and
fair to poor results in those patients treated after two years of
the lesion[2]. In our series, patients with posterior dislocation
unreduced for a period less than three months had better results than
those with a dislocation unreduced for a period more than three months.
The most important aspect of the examination is the determination
of the size of the humeral head defect. The size of the defect, expressed
as a percentage of the humeral head articular surface, is the key
factor in determining treatment. It is calculated radiographically,
including standard trauma series and axillary lateral view as well
as the computed tomography. The size of the anteromedial defects can
be quite variable. In chronic cases, the size of the defect is larger
than in acute posterior dislocations that are reduced properly. This
is due to two causes: first, multiple episodes of posterior dislocation,
even if reduced properly, can result in a larger defect. Second, prolonged
contact between the posterior glenoid and the humeral head, as occurs
in chronic unreduced dislocations and the following physiotherapy
to achieve range of motion when the diagnosis is missed, may result
in defects that encompass a significant portion of the humeral head.
In acute dislocations, defects of less than 20% will not probably
contribute to recurrent instability. However, in chronic dislocations,
a defect of even this size may require subscapularis transfer at the
time of open reduction. Defects of 20% to 45% are usually found in
association with chronic dislocations. Following open reduction of
these injuries, a subscapularis transfer (McLaughlin's procedure)
or a lesser tuberosity transfer (modified McLaughlin's procedure)
will be required to maintain stability. An alternative is the rotational
osteotomy of the humerus for restoring the glenohumeral congruity.
Keppler and co-authors, advocated the rotational osteotomy of the
humerus in ten patients with locked posterior dislocation of the shoulder
and a humeral head defect involving 20% to 40% of the articular surface.
The final outcome was not very encouraging since six patients had
good-excellent results, two patients had fair results and two patients
demonstrated poor results[7]. The disadvantage of this technique compared
to subscapularis transfer is the use of hardware.
In cases that the humeral head defect is greater than 45% of the articular
surface or there is a significant deterioration of the remaining articular
cartilage of the humeral head or the glenoid, prosthetic replacement
is preferred. Cheng and co-workers advocated total shoulder arthroplasty
of seven shoulders in five patients who had locked posterior dislocation
of the glenohumeral joint[3]. They reported that the American Shoulder
and Elbow Surgeons' Shoulder score improved significantly from 20.1
before surgery to 55.6 after surgery (p=0.018). Gerber and colleagues
managed four patients with chronic locked posterior dislocation of
the glenohumeral joint associated with a defect of the humeral head
greater than 40% of the articular surface with reconstruction of the
shape of the humeral head with use of an allogeneic segment of the
femoral head[5]. Three patients demonstrated satisfactory results
and restored stability for an average period of six years. The fourth
patient developed secondary avascular necrosis of the remaining portion
of the humeral head.
McLaughlin's procedure is defined as a transfer of the subscapularis
tendon into an anteromedial humeral head defect that resulted from
either an acute or a chronic posterior glenohumeral dislocation[9,10].
Modified McLaughlin procedure consists of a transfer of the lesser
tuberosity with the subscapularis attached, into the anteromedial
humeral head defect. McLaughlin technique is indicated in small humeral
head defects, up to 25%, in which the soft tissue alone is sufficient
to fill the defect. Modified McLaughlin technique, is indicated in
larger defects, 25% to 45%, with the subscapularis attached adequately
to fill the bony defect and prevent recurrent instability. Our technique
of utilizing a small bone piece instead of the whole lesser trochanter
has some advantages when compared to McLaughlin and modified McLaughlin
technique. In comparison with the McLaughlin technique, the advantage
is the use of the small bone, which is large enough to stabilize the
sutures passed through the transferred tendon. In comparison with
the modified McLaughlin technique, osteotomy of a larger amount of
the lesser tuberosity may result in compromise of the most medial
aspect of the bicipital groove causing mal-tracking and subluxation
of the biceps tendon, necessitating tenodesis. The small amount of
bone taken in our series prevents problems of biceps tendon subluxation
that could result from disruption of the medial insertion of the transverse
humeral ligament.
We conclude that in chronic locked posterior dislocations associated
with an anteromedial defect between 20% and 40% of the articular surface,
open reduction and subscapularis tendon transfer is the treatment
of choice. McLaughlin's technique reliably decreases pain and significantly
improves range of motion and level of function, restoring the stability
of the glenohumeral joint. If extensive damage to the articular surfaces
of the humerus and glenoid are observed, involving more than 40% of
the articular surface, shoulder arthroplasty is indicated but the
results are related to the integrity of the rotator cuff. In these
cases, derotation osteotomy can be used as an alternative but the
critical factor is the condition of the articular cartilage of the
humeral head and the glenoid.
REFERENCES
1. Buhler M,. Gerber C. Shoulder instability related to epileptic
seizures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11, 4, 309-14.
2. Checchia S.L., Santos P.D., Miyazaki A.N. Surgical treatment of
acute and chronic posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7, 1, 53-65.
3. Cheng S.L., Mackay M.B., Richards R.R. Treatment of locked posterior
fracture-dislocations of the shoulder by total shoulder arthroplasty.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997; 6, 1, 11-7.
4. Constant C.R., Murley A.H.G. A clinical method of functional assessment
of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987; 214, 160-4.
5. Gerber C., Lambert S.M. Allograft reconstruction of segmental defects
of the humeral head for the treatment of chronic locked posterior
dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78, 3, 376-82.
6. Hawkins R.J., Neer C.S. 2nd, Pianta R.M., Mendoza F.X. Locked posterior
dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69, 1, 9-18.
7. Keppler P., Holz U., Thielemann F.W., Meinig R. Locked posterior
dislocation of the shoulder: treatment using rotational osteotomy
of the humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 1994; 8, 4 286-92.
8. Loebenberg M.I., Cuomo F. The treatment of chronic anterior and
posterior dislocations of the glenohumeral joint and associated articular
cartilage defects. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000; 31, 1, 23-34.
9. McLaughlin H.L. Locked posterior subluxation of the shoulder: diagnosis
and treatment. Surg Clin North Am. 1963; 43, 1621-8.
10. McLaughlin H.L. Posterior dislocation of the shoulder. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1952; 34, 584-90.
11. Perron A.D., Jones R.L. Posterior shoulder dislocation: avoiding
a missed diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med 2000; 18, 2, 189-91.
12. Rayan G.M. Compression brachial plexopathy caused by chronic posterior
dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint. J Okla State Med Assoc.
1994; 87, 1, 7-9.
13. Vastamaki M., Solonen K.A. Posterior dislocation and fracture
dislocation of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980; 51, 3, 479-84.
Mailing
address:
John C. Feroussis, MD
12 Kanari Street
Alimos Ð 17455, Athens, Greece
Tel: 6944566656, Fax: 210-9889241
Email: jcfer@otenet.gr